_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC . |
Docket. No: 00289-14
13 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of. your.
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United .
States Code section 1552.
A three- -member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your a
application on 12 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 7
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the. evidence submitted was insufficient ©
to establish the existence of probable. material error or
injustice.
“You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 9. August 2006. On 15 February 2008, you received
counseling concerning a violation of a lawful order by not
applying the required checklist and procedures which resulted.in _
the accidental firing of the cartridge actuating devices on. two
‘stations and jettison. of. two full external fuel tanks from an:>
aircraft. On 27 August. 2010, you. were informed and acknowledged
that you were not eligible’ to reenlist and would be assigned. a
waivable RE-1C (eligible for reenlistment, but denied further
service’ ‘by the Commandant of the Marine Corps). reentry code upon
your separation. You were separated on 8 September 2010, with.
an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE- 1c.
: reentry: code.
The Board found that the assignment of an RE-1C reentry code was
warranted by the counseling entry of 15 February 2008.
_ Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the - members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
imaterial evidence or other matter not previously considered by
' the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
-ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
‘Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0446 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0534 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were separated on 15 July 2011, with an honorable discharge due to non-retention on active duty and assigned an RE-3C (when directed by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0324 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3348 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. On 15 October 2008, you were discharged in pay grade E-2 with a general characterization of service due to misconduct, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1900 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. After careful and conscienticus consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0680 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3047 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is ‘discharged at the expiration of their term of active obligated service and is not...